40 QUESTIONS ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST [transcriber (Diane) comments]
1). What proof exists that the Nazis practiced genocide or deliberately killed 6 million Jews?
None. The only evidence is the contradictory testimony of individual survivors and no survivor claims actually to have witnessed any gassing. There was no hard evidence whatsoever. No mounds of ashes. No piles of clothes. No crematory capable of doing the job. No human soap. No lampshades made out of human skin, no record, no demographic statistics. On the other hand, there exists extensive evidence of a forensic demographic, analytical documentary, anecdotal and comparative nature, which clearly proves the impossibility of such a figure as 6 million jewish dead, an exaggeration of possibly 1,000%.
2) How did German concentration camps differ from American relocation camps, which interned Japanese and German[and Italian] Americans during World War II.
Except for the name, the only difference was that the Germans interned persons, who were a real or a suspected threat to the German war effort, whereas the Americans interned persons on the basis of their race or national origin alone.
3) Why did the German authorities intern Jews in the concentration camps?
Because the Germans considered the Jews a direct threat to their national sovereignty and survival, correctly, as it turned out. Jews were overwhelmingly represented in Germany and communist subversion during the Weimar period. On a per capita basis, Jews were highly overrepresented in government, commercial, and media positions; however, all suspected security risks, not just Jews, were in danger of internment once the war broke out. On March 24, 1933, international Jewry declared war on Germany and ordered a worldwide boycott of German goods, simply because the German government had removed Jews from influential positions and transferred power back to the German people. The boycott order and the Jewish war against Germany were reported in the world print and broadcast media of the time. [Also in 1939, Chaim Weizmann sent a letter to Churchill promising total Jewish support in fighting against Germany.] False stories of German death camps were, in fact, circulated even before the outbreak of WWII; therefore, the German view of the Jewish people as enemy aliens would seem to have been fully justified.
4) Did Simon Wiesenthal once admit that there were never any death camps [even if there were] on German soil?
Yes, in Books and Bookmen, April 1975, issue, he claims the gassing of all the Jews took place in Poland.
5) Dachau is in Germany. If even Simon Wiesenthal now admits it was not a death camp, why do thousands of American veterans say it was?
Because after the Allies captured Dachau, an incidentally murdered dozens of the former staff without trial, thousands of G.I.s were led through the camp and showed buildings alleged to be gas chambers. This story was later quietly expunged from official holocaust lore because it became too difficult to maintain in the face of known fact and because Dachau was in the Allied occupation zone, where access to the camp was too easy and unrestricted. The brief lifespan of the Dachau death camp version gave rise to the first critical examination and questioning of the holocaust myth by historians and by some Allied veterans, who noticed discrepancies in what they had seen and what they read in the official accounts. It would be many years, though, before this early holocaust revisionism gained momentum.
6) Auschwitz is in Poland, not Germany. Is there any proof that gas chambers for the purpose of killing people existed at Auschwitz?
No. The gas chamber exhibited to tourists at Auschwitz could not possibly have been used to carry out executions. It is far too small, and it’s not even airtight. In the 1980s, American expert, Fred Leuchter, who builds gas chambers for American penal systems, took scrapings from the walls of the Auschwitz gas chamber for chemical analysis. He found no cyanide residue at all. The Auschwitz exhibit is a fake, pure and simple – a flimsy tourist trap.
7) If Auschwitz wasn’t a death camp, what was its true purpose?
It was a large-scale manufacturing complex. Synthetic rubber called buna was made there, and its inmates were used as a workforce, in the same way in which inmate labor is increasingly being used in correctional systems throughout the United States today.
8) What about the infamous Zyklon B gas?
Zyklon B is a commercially manufactured compound of hydrocyanic gas. It has a number of widespread industrial uses, including the fumigation of lice-infested clothing, the purpose for which it was applied at Auschwitz. Zyklon B is still manufactured worldwide and is commonly used and available today.
9) If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did former Commandant Rudolf Hoess confess that it was?
Hoess was captured by the Russians and Polish communists and brutally tortured. He signed his confession, which is the sole source for the figure of 6 million dead Jews in English, a language that he could not read. Some pages of the original document are literally stained with Hoess’ blood. Hoess was then conveniently executed so he could not be cross-examined.
10) How long does it take to fully ventilate an area fumigated with Zyklon B?
About 20 hours. The whole procedure is extremely involved and technical. Gas masks have to be used and well-trained technicians only are employed.
11) Rudolf Hoess said in his confession, that his men would enter the gas chamber ten minutes after the Jews had died and remove the bodies. How do you explain this?
It can’t be explained because it couldn’t have happened like that. Had the Germans done this, they would have suffered the same fate as the allegedly exterminated Jews.
12) Hoess said in his confession, that his men would smoke cigarettes as they pulled dead Jews out of chambers, which 10 minutes before had been filled with gas. Isn’t Zyklon B explosive? [Not to mention the Germans wouldn’t have been doing the heavy lifting here. Had this happened, they’d have gotten the other inmates to do this, which was suggested in a number of ‘movies’ on the subject.]
Highly so. The Hoess confession is obviously false, and the 6 million figure as well.
13) How could such a mass murder program have been kept secret from Jews who were scheduled for execution? How could the pope, the Vatican, the International Red Cross (IRC), and Allied military intelligence not know?
Given the acknowledged efficiency and penetration of the OSS, British MI5 and the Soviet NKVD into the Third Reich, it could not have been kept secret nor can one imagine any reason for the Allies, who were fighting to destroy Germany not to make use of such a potentially powerful propaganda weapon, had there been any contemporary evidence at all during the war, that such an event was occurring.
14) How many Jews actually died in German concentration camps during the war?
15) How did they die?
Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that ravaged a war-torn Europe during the period. Typhus is a disease which invariably appears wherever people are jammed together for long periods without bathing. It’s carried by lice, which infects hair and clothes. Ironically, if the Germans had used more Zyklon B for disinfectant purposes, more Jews might have survived the concentration camps. Jewish prisoners, as well as many others, also died from starvation and lack of medical attention towards the end of the war when virtually all rail and road transport had come to a standstill due to the intense Allied bombing campaign.
16) What is the difference whether 6 million Jews or 300,000 died?
5,700,000. The key question is whether or not there was a deliberate, systematic attempt on the part of the Third Reich to exterminate the Jews of Europe. As the evidence clearly shows, that there was not, and the focus of world attention now needs to shift to the identity, the activities, and the financial and political motivations of those who have inflicted on all humanity for the past 70 years, the grotesque, slanderous and evil lie that there was a holocaust.
17) Many Jewish survivors of the death camps say they saw bodies being piled up in pits and burned. How much gasoline would have been used to perform this act?
A lot more than the Germans had access to or could have afforded to waste during the Second World War, that’s for sure.
18) Can bodies be burned in pits?
No. It’s impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner as not enough heat to be generated in open pits. It is impossible to completely destroy human bodies en masse with either gasoline, napalm, or in any other way in open pits. The holocaust experts who claim otherwise are either parroting what they’ve been told without bothering to check their facts or else, they’re lying.
19) Holocaust authors claim the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in about 10 minutes. How long does it take to incinerate a body, according to professional funeral operators?
About 2 hours.
20) Why did concentration camps have crematory ovens?
To dispose efficiently and sanitarily of the corpses dead from typhus and other diseases.
21) Given a 100% duty cycle of all the known crematoria in all the camps in German-controlled territory, what is the maximum number of corpses, which it would have been possible to incinerate during the entire time the camps were in existence?
22) Can a crematory oven be operated 100% of the time?
No. 50% of the time is a very generous estimate or 12 hours per day. Crematory ovens have to be cleaned thoroughly and regularly when in heavy operation.
23) On the average, how much ash is left from a cremated corpse?
After the bone is ground down into powder, a separate time-consuming process in itself, about a shoe box full.
24) If 6 million people were incinerated by the Nazis, what happened to the ashes?
Well, that remains to be explained. 6 million bodies would produce literally mountains of ash, tons upon tons, yet there have been no discoveries of any huge deposits of ash in the Auschwitz area or anywhere else in Europe.
25) Did Allied wartime photos of Auschwitz taken from the air show any signs of crematory in full-blast operation?
No. These photographs do not reveal even a trace of the immense amount of smoke, which must have hung constantly over the camp, nor do they show any evidence of the alleged open pits, where the bodies were burned.
26) What did the International Red Cross have to say about the whole holocaust issue?
A report of the visit of an IRC delegation to Auschwitz in September 1944, pointed out that internees were allowed to receive packages and that rumors of gas chambers could not be verified. The full official report of the International Red Cross on the Second World War makes no mention at all of the so-called holocaust or any of the wilder allegations connected with the so-called holocaust. Interestingly, in 2011, over 70 years after the war’s end, the liberal media in America and Europe began running a series of articles claiming that the Red Cross was full of Nazi sympathizers. This charge is entirely bogus, and it may be chalked up to belated Jewish attempts at damage control, as the holocaust myth crumbles steadily in the light of factual examination and critical analysis.
27) Is the diary of Anne Frank genuine?
Not as published, no. The evidence compiled by Ditlieb Felderer of Sweden and Dr. Robert Faurisson of France proves conclusively that the published version of the famous diary is a literary hoax. There was a girl named Anne Frank and sections of the diary appear to be genuine, including several wherein she describes adolescent lesbian sexual experiences, which were later excised from the published text. In 1950, Anne Frank’s father sued author, Meyer Levin, the actual writer of the diary, over royalties from the book. A Jewish judge in New York ordered the records of the court case sealed for 100 years. When the original diary was put on display a few years later, it was noticed, that the most poignant sections of the book were interpolations, written in a forged handwriting in ballpoint pen, a writing instrument which was not invented until 1950. The original diary was swiftly removed from exhibit and whisked away into a safety deposit box in Israel. It has never been produced for examination, since then, despite repeated attempts by scholars to view it.
28) What about all the numerous photographs and film footage allegedly taken in German concentration camps showing emaciated corpses and people. Are these faked?
Some are, but most of the fakery lies in the captioning. Corpses of German air raid victims, for example, are labeled as dead Jews. The one famous and oft-reprinted photo purports to show a “Nazi SS man about to shoot a mother holding her child”. On closer examination of the blurry print with a magnifying glass, it is clear to military historians familiar with the uniforms and weapons of the period, that the “killer” is a Red Army soldier, wielding a Russian-made carbine. The exterminationists’ habit of blaming the Germans for atrocities actually carried out by the Soviet dictator, Josef Stalin, remains common, even though some of the more notorious examples, like the Katyn Forest massacre of Polish prisoners had now been properly laid at the door of the Kremlin. But this kind of fraud continues to be perpetrated by holocaust ‘experts’ is not surprising in view of the fact that almost all of them espouse Marxist or extreme left wing views and are as quick to apologize for and explain away Stalin’s butcheries as they are to invent fraudulent crimes attributed to Adolf Hitler. The almost universally leftist political and social orientation of holocaust defenders is important and should always be born in mind when examining their claims. Letting Stalin off the hook is almost as important to them as blackening and defaming the memory of Hitler and the German people.
29) What was the role of the Vatican during the time in which 6 million Jews were allegedly exterminated?
Had there been an extermination plan being carried out in a predominantly Catholic country like Poland, the Vatican would certainly have been in a position to learn about it. Since no such plan existed, the Vatican had no need to speak out about it.
30) What evidence is there that Adolf Hitler ordered the extermination of the Jews?
None. No documentary evidence of any kind indicating a deliberate extermination plan on the part of the Nazis has ever come to light. No signed order from Hitler, from Reichsfuhrer SS Heinrich Himmler or from any other functionary of the Third Reich, ordering the extermination of the Jews has ever been discovered. The Nazis were meticulous records-keepers and literally, tons of documents were seized by the Allies at the end of the war, so many that it took Allied archivists and scholars years to organize, file and catalog them all. Nothing – zip! Nada.
31) Did the Germans and the Zionists collaborate before and during the war?
Absolutely. Both groups were interested in removing the Jews from Europe. The Zionists wanted the Jews shipped to Palestine and they maintained friendly relations throughout the war. The German official in charge of shipping thousands of Jews [900,000] of Jews to then British-occupied Palestine, including future Israel Prime Minister Menachin Began, was Adolf Eichmann. After the war, the holocaust industry considered this secret so volatile and dangerous, that Eichmann was abducted by the Israeli Mossad and, subsequently, murdered in order to silence him.
32) How many Jews were in areas, which came to be controlled by the Germans during the Second World War?
Slightly less than 4 million.
33) How many Jews fled deep into the Soviet Union to escape the Nazis?
Over 2 million. The Germans didn’t have access to them to kill them [that was their intent].
34) If European Jews weren’t exterminated by the Nazis, what happened to them?
After the war, most of Jews emigrated to Palestine, the United States, Argentina, Canada and Great Britain. Except for about 300,000, they are all accounted for.
35) How does the Holocaust story benefit the Jewish people today?
It shields them from any criticism over their political, economic and social behavior. It’s instrumental in raising immense sums of ‘guilt’ money, especially from the German government. It justifies aid to the state of Israel, totally almost $10 billion per year from various sources. Israel has received almost $70 billion in assorted holocaust reparations and the ante is growing every year. It’s clearly in the interest of Israel with the Jewish people, to keep the scam going.
36) Are films like “Holocaust”, “Schindler’s List, The Winds of War, Sophie’s Choice,” etc. documentaries?
Hollywood movies are not history and they’re not intended to be. They are fictionalized dramas. The characters in movies are actors, not real people, who are being very highly paid for their portrayal of events that did not, in fact, occur. They read their lines from a screening play, written by Hollywood scriptwriters, a profession, where Jews are very highly overrepresented as they are in the studios and the creative and the financial sectors of filmmaking. Hollywood is such an extremely unreliable source of history that in recent years, even mainstream reviewers and commentators have begun to express doubt and suspicion over certain films. For example, the character of Oscar Schindler, as portrayed by Liam Neeson in Spielberg’s production of “Schindler’s List”, was sanitized to the point of being unrecognizable. Schindler was portrayed as almost saintly and yet none of those still living, who remember the man, have a single good word to say about him. The real Schindler was a confidence artist, a thief, a libertine, and a degenerate gambler, who indulged freely in forced sexual relations with young female camp inmates. He later abandoned his wife and fled with his mistress to Brazil, after embezzling a large sum of money. Other major directors like Oliver Stone, who’ve come under fire because their portrayals of historical characters like Nixon and events like the JFK assassination reflect a paranoid obsession with the most bizarre of left-wing conspiracy theories.
37) How many books have been published, which refute some aspect of the standard Jewish claims about the holocaust?
Over 100 with more in the works.
38) But aren’t all those who question the holocaust antisemitic or neo-Nazis?
Some are; although, why such people should be denied the same right to advance their viewpoint which liberal democracy grants so freely to Jews and liberals in this purportedly free society, is never explained. Most revisionists, however, are academics – genuine scholars, who seek only the truth. Many hold liberal or libertarian views; although, these views often change, as they’re subjected to the intense persecution which accompanies any deviation from the official orthodoxy of the holocaust.
39) What has happened to historians, who dispute the official version of the holocaust?
A variety of unpleasant things. Significantly, the Jews have always refused to debate the facts of the holocaust openly with revisionists. An Internet group, allegedly set up for this purpose, called “Nizkor” does not, in fact, debate revisionists but engages in hysterical campaigns of ad hominem abuse against anyone who dares to express any dissent or doubt regarding the holocaust. It’s clear from many of the postings to Nizkor’s Internet playgroups, that they have attracted a number of people, mostly Jews, but some left liberal gentiles as well, who are motivated by intense racial bigotry and ideological hatred of anyone who disagrees with them and who, in some cases, appear to be severely mentally and emotionally disturbed. The Jews respond to any questioning of the holocaust with hatred, violence and persecution, which in itself is the surest give-away that they have something to hide. In many countries, those who ask politically incorrect or searching questions about the holocaust are arrested, tortured and imprisoned. Dr. Robert Faurisson was assaulted by a Jewish gang, who beat him so badly that he was almost crippled. In California, a major revisionist book seller’s offices were burned and in Toronto, revisionist author Ernst Zundel’s home was almost destroyed in an arson attack. Zundel himself was subjected to a bizarre series of show trials, lasting over 10 years by the Canadian government. After finally being acquitted, he was denied Canadian citizenship and eventually deported to Germany, where he spent 5 years in prison for questioning the official version of that country’s history. An American citizen, Gerhard Lauck of Lincoln, Nebraska was kidnapped by the German government and served a lengthy prison sentence in Germany for the so-called crime of writing pro-National Socialist commentary in the United States, where it’s legal. Another American citizen, Hans Schmidt of Florida was also abducted, held in prison in Germany for almost a year and released only after an international outcry. Schmidt’s so-called crime was writing a pro-revisionist article in English and a newsletter published and distributed in the United States. German nationalist, Manfred Roeder has been in prison so many times, he’s lost count. Revisionists have been stripped of jobs and academic posts, denied tenure in universities, victimized by harassing lawsuits, received bombs in the mail and subjected to constant death threats from Jews and Marxists. These are not the reactions of innocent people. Innocent people, who are accused of a crime or fraud do not respond by trying to kill, imprison or forcibly silence their accusers. More than anything else, the behavior of the Jews and the governments they influence so strongly proves that the holocaust is a fraud. If the holocaust was true, neither the Jews nor any state authority would need to use force to silence criticism any more than force need be used against people, who believe the earth is flat. The arrests, imprisonments, assaults and torture used are the equivalent of a full confession on the part of the Jewish people that they are contemptible liars, who have imposed the most massive and vicious hoax in history on all of humanity and have used that hoax as an excuse to rob us blind, steal another people’s country and then to slaughter that country’s original inhabitants at will.
40) Have these thuggish tactics succeeded in silencing revisionists?
No. They have only made Revisionists more determined than ever to ensure that the truth comes out and that the nations of the earth understand how the Jewish people have lied to them, defrauded them and robbed them for over a century now with the holocaust lie. There can be little doubt that in succeeding generations, the holocaust will be accepted by mainstream historians and the public at large for what it is – a politically inspired hoax.