Our letter to Fredrick Toben.
Hi, Fredrick. Thank you for your comments. Rather than Jim and I sending you separate letters, we are collaborating, joining our thoughts. We will be sending out another email with our ZOOM video (as I call them) (above) and added links that might be helpful (below). Diane
We do agree with what you’re saying in your very long letter to us, but here is what I don’t understand and what bothers me.
First and briefly, the infighting mentioned. Diane suggests we encourage the battling personalities to discuss their grievances privately and not air them with the rest of us. If they are at an impasse, that one of us can help mediate. We don’t want to compromise ‘the mission’ and we don’t want to take valuable time and resources away from this mission, which infighting does.
John Kaminski: “When people obsess about being the queen of some idea when we all should be working together to overthrow this Jewish menace that is plundering the world, I am naturally skeptical. This is not a beauty contest, and it’s really not about one person, or about one nationality. The threat we are facing is a threat to everyone everywhere.” (See pix below)
Next, it appears that AFP/TBR and IHR have not addressed the Holocaust issue as much as I think they should — the fact that the Jews are responsible for the lies resulting in many tens of millions of deaths, as you know. It’s dangerous coming up against the jews, as many have discovered, but unfortunately, still necessary. When they make bold assertions or take restrictive actions (as with our laws to suppress our opinions), it makes it unpleasant to challenge them. That’s how they want it, of course so they can continue to use the holohoax to torment and oppress many people and FUND their projects.
Those who ‘bow’ to this pressure do so for a number of reasons, one being if they don’t ‘play’ by the jew rules, they will be ruined financially – won’t be able to sell their papers or books or whatever. They are willing to compromise. They then declare that the holocost is irrelevant, something they don’t have to discuss or even deal with. However, this is incorrect. It is MOST relevant. The fact of its relevance appears on line, in the newspapers, on TV – EVERY TIME YOU TURN AROUND. The Jews don’t hesitate to bring up their holohoax in EVERY venue – like the State of the Union Address – pathetic, sycophantic, slobbering about the phony jewish ‘survivor’ and narrative. (Carolyn Yeager speaks about this below.)
The media is controlled, so we must resort to our tried and true methods – for IHR and AFP/TBR, that means their publications. Every time the jews AGAIN trot out their sad and sorry narrative, we MUST AGAIN challenge them on the whole premise, addressing whatever occurs. Diane believes they are acting like desperate/cornered animals, coming after our freedom of expression/speech through the ANTI-BDS legislation (approved by half of the states already, including Texas), the pressure to appoint an antisemitism czar, drawing the metaphoric (or literal) noose around our necks. They are moving forward to make the holohoax issue mandatory for school curriculum, financed by the taxpayer. It doesn’t sound like the holohoax is ‘irrelevant’ and to suggest so is a COP-OUT!!!
The next thing I want to mention has to do with how AFP/TBR officers are treating Elizabeth Carto. It’s NOT RIGHT. Willis provided for Elisabeth – a death benefit – so that the organizations he founded would take care of her. They determined they were short of funds to keep the organization going so instead of taking a pay cut from their HUGE wages, they cut out her benefit – threw her UNDER THE BUS – KICKED HER TO THE CURB. That MOST definitely MUST be addressed!
In closing, IHR and AFP/TBR are seemingly dodging and weaving, avoiding the CORE (heart of the) ISSUE of the holohoax, attempting to steer the focus away from themselves or the really difficult topics (difficult because of the jewish blowback). Discussing foreign/military policy, international issues, are all well and good, but not if they are used to distract and decoy from the cause of our problems – the jews and how they use the holohoax to bully the rest of us. Since, we feel the holocost is the “meat and potatoes” of the problems in our world in general and the U.S. specifically, the fact that they’re not dealing with the holohoax is (again) just a cop out and they are most definitely NOT doing the job that they should be doing – in fact, Willis Carto’s legacy.
Appreciate your efforts,
Jim and Diane
THE LIFE AND LEGACY OF WILLIS A. CARTO—-
POPULISM’S FOUNDING FATHER BETRAYED: PART 1
For those of you who respect what President Donald Trump is attempting to do to restore traditional values to America, it’s most likely that many of you may have never heard of the man who blazed the way for Trump to sweep into the Oval office: Willis Allison Carto. In fact, his list of accomplishments is so significant, it would fill many volumes, but without a doubt, Carto was the most important Nationalist, populist figure in America prior to Trump. Carto was born in 1926 and passed away peacefully..with his wife of nearly 60 years by his side..on October 26, 2015. His wife, Elisabeth was also by his side throughout his entire life, contributing greatly to his success. Born in Fort Wayne, Indiana, Carto was drafted into the u.s.army in 1944, earning a Purple Heart when he received a memento from a Japanese infantryman on Cebu island in the Philippines on May 5, 1945. Carto carried the scars of that wound to his last day.
Now everything Carto created…from 1953 to 2015..and passed on to his wife, is in danger of being lost. It was in 2001 that Carto began publication of American Free Press (AFP) a weekly newspaper in the populist motif of an earlier newspaper he created, The Spotlight. AFP is published to this day but is in danger of imminent collapse due to the machinations of three men. Circulation, which began at around 60,000 subscribers, is now well below 10,000 and falling fast. This is due to the fact that the paper has strayed from its original mission of covering stories ignored by the corporate media, so-called “controversial” issues. It is also due to the fact that there have been no attempts to increase subscribership..for new subscribers or contact those who let their subscriptions expire..which may seem counterintuitive but is being done for reasons which will be explained later. In March of 2014 the Carto’s accountant declared that the companies’ total assets were $2.4 million, an indication of how successful the empire was that the Cartos built over six decades. In 2015, in poor health, Carto made provisions to have his lifetime of work continued, and two of these men, Christopher J. Petherick and Paul T. Angel..who Carto employed for many years..had given their solemn word of honor that they would continue in the tradition that he had laid down for AFP and its sister publication,
The Barnes Review (TBR). TBR was founded by Carto..as publisher and editor..in 1994 as a bimonthly magazine covering America first causes and revisionist history. He could never have known that these individuals that he trusted, would assault his legacy before he was even buried in Arlington National cemetery in February of 2016, although it was revealed after his death that Petherick and Angel had connived at least three times to take control of Carto’s life’s work. Neither attended his funeral services nor did they send anything to mark his passing. This in light of the fact that both..as Independent contractors..were paid handsomely by Carto, to the tune of over $100,000 each, annually. Carto had set up a board of directors for AFP and TBR, with five individuals overseeing all company business. He was the chairman of the board but before he died, Petherick and Angel “packed” the board, acting as if they were now the owners of these two entities, as well as a third: The Foundation to Defend the First Amendment (FDFA) a non-profit dedicated to..as the title states…the defense of the U.S. Constitution’s First amendment. Willis was dead for less than a year, and his name was removed as founder from AFP. Then Petherick and Angel claimed they lacked sufficient funds to continue operating both AFP and TBR and needed to cut expenses. Willis…who worked for over 60 years for Nationalist causes without ever getting paid…had set up a retirement stipend for himself and his wife during the last few months of his life.
Less than six months after his death, they ousted Elisabeth in April of 2016. When AFP and TBR subscribers would call the office to ask about Elisabeth…she was a permanent fixture there for all those decades…the people answering the phone were directed to lie and to tell the callers she had retired voluntarily. In January of 2017, Petherick and Angel reneged on the stipend that Elisabeth was entitled to…according to the contract they signed…leaving her in a tenuous financial position, as she had depended upon Willis to provide for her daily needs for almost her entire life. Petherick and Angel had ordered their highly paid lackey, AFP’s webmaster, Canadian Jason Snow..to do the dirty work and leave Mrs. Carto to fend for herself, such a short time after her husband’s death. Revealingly, Petherick..who for years maintained the title of executive editor, now referred to himself as editor-in-chief…emailed Elisabeth with the following on January 9, 2017:
“See below and the attached letter from Jason Snow to you. He will be your point of contact for this from here on.”
CHRISTOPHER J. PETHERICK,
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, AMERICAN FREE PRESS
Jason Snow’s January 8, 2017 email:
Jason Snow here.
Attached is a copy of an official letter I sent you by mail more than a week ago. We can no longer afford to pay you your stipend. January will be your last payment. Also, I will be your only contact from now on. Everyone in the organization has been told not to respond to your emails, letters phone calls and visits. If you have something you wish to address the organization, it will be done through me. We need to make these ( and other cuts) to stay in business. I’m sure you understand.
Effectively, Willis Carto’s widow, while still grieving, was told with only a few days notice that she would no longer receive anything from the companies she and her husband had created. After all she’s been through, Elisabeth continues working diligently on Willis’ papers and has created two websites to share his life’s work. She does not intend to stop soon. This…while Petherick and Angel continue to pay themselves exorbitantly, each taking home $100,000 annually. Snow, meanwhile, the part-time webmaster is “earning” nearly $50,000 a year for doing almost nothing. Even more alarming is the fact that the AFP had gone from a weekly paper…since its inception..to biweekly, but Petherick, Angel and Snow suffered no reduction in pay, although there was half the amount of work that needed to be done.
Incredibly, these three have taken steps to declare themselves owners of the companies the Cartos created. This was revealed in the pages of AFP, which is required to annually print United States Postal Service Form 3526,which is a statement of ownership that lists the number of the newspapers subscribers (8,216). Petherick, Angel and Snow are now listed as the owners. In effect, they are squatters, milking these companies for all they can get from them.
TO BE CONTINUED…….
This is part 1 of how Willis and Elisabeth Carto’s America first mission is being betrayed and in danger of becoming irrelevant. Stay tuned for more information on how this organization…which held out so much hope for the common man…is now nothing more than a tool used by three men to enrich themselves at the expense of all that was painstakingly created by the Cartos.
PUBLIUS, an Author of the Federalist Papers, Reporting from Washington, D.C.
How can they come up with an explanation when the witnesses don’t even agree with each other.
One of the trump cards the Holocaust historians and promoters like to use is what they call the “convergence of evidence”. All available evidence they tell us, either testimonies, photos, documents, or anything, point to one single conclusion: The Holocaust as we know it.
Unfortunately, this is nothing but an illusion – in other words, a Matrix, as portrayed in the 1999 science-fiction film of that name. In order to make this clear we will pick five members of the Sonderkommando (Filip Muller, Henryk Tauber, Shlomo Venezia, Marcel Nadjari, Leon Cohen), as they are the most important eyewitnesses, and ask them 10 simple questions. Then we will see if their statements, as they appear in their respective memoirs, actually “converge.” All the questions are on essential points and not on some minor details. So their convergence or divergence is of the utmost importance for the official story. Are you ready to take the Red Pill (a choice against the Blue Pill, to prolong the illusions, featured in the above-mentioned movie)? Here we go.
Question #1: Where was the gas chamber?
• In a fake shower room (Muller, Tauber, Nadjari, Venezia).
• In a room next to the fake shower room (Cohen).
Question #2: How many holes were there on the roof?
• One (Nadjari, Venezia).
• One every 8 meters (Cohen).
• Four (Tauber).
Question #3: How was the gas inserted?
• Directly (Nadjari, Venezia).
• Through pillars made of sheet metal (Muller).
• Through pillars covered with pierced metal plates (Cohen).
• Through pillars made of three layers of iron mesh (Tauber).
Question #4: How many people could you fit into the chamber?
• 750 (Cohen).
• 2,500 (Nadjari).
• 3,000 (Muller).
Question #5: After throwing in the gas how long did you wait before opening the door?
• A few minutes (Muller).
• 10-12 minutes (Venezia).
• One hour (Nadjari).
• Two hours (Tauber, Cohen).
Question #6: When did you start on the ventilation?
• Before opening the door (Muller, Tauber, Nadjari).
• After opening the door (Venezia, Cohen).
Question #7: How long was the ventilation on?
• A few minutes (Muller).
• 20 minutes (Venezia).
• Two hours (Cohen).
Question #8: Did you notice any unusual color on the corpses?
• No (Nadjari).
• Many had turned blue (Muller).
• Some were red, some were pale (Venezia).
• Pinkish, some were covered with green marks (Tauber).
• Black near the columns, pink away from them (Cohen).
Question #9: Did you wear gas masks while working in the chamber?
• Yes (Muller, Tauber).
• No (Venezia).
Question #10: How many corpses could you cremate in 24 hours?
• 1,800 (Venezia).
• 2,500 (Nadjari, Tauber).
• 3,000 (Muller).
• 3,600 (Cohen).
So there you have it. Remember that all of this is supposed to be firsthand information from people who worked at the exact same installations during the same time period. But as any magician will tell you, for the illusion to work you need to always distract the audience. And that’s what the Holocaust historians do. They never give you the complete picture. Because they fear that once you see it, the spell will be broken and you will never go back.
So what will it be Dear Reader? It takes courage, it takes determination, but if you choose the Red Pill, welcome to the real world. Including the real Holocaust—what of it was real, anyway.
Fake Gas Chambers
NKVD SOVIET JEWS FORCED GERMANS TO BUILD FAKE GAS CHAMBERS AFTER THE WAR.
I was held by the Russians in Sachsen-hausen, and made to build a gas chamber there; this is what I saw. HAVE YOU heard of the case concerning Gerhart Schirmer, a retired Bundeswehr officer who was prosecuted a few years ago for contravening the law, this time in Germany, which makes any denial or diminution of the ‘Holocaust’ a criminal offence? As a young officer, Schirmer was captured in 1945 by the Russians and held in Sachsenhausen which the Russians continued to use as a prison. Although the War and Nazism were over, Schirmer and a few fellow-prisoners were forced to construct a gas chamber and execution room, to show the world what the Nazis had done. He described his experiences in a booklet entitled ‘Sachsenhausen – Workuta, Zehn Jahre in den Fängen der Sowjets’ (Grabert Verlag, Tübingen, 1992).
When ‘certain groups’ drew the attention of the authorities to the booklet’s contents, it was seized and banned in Germany. This is described by Schirmer below (my translation). I understand Schirmer was given the choice of a fine or prison and he chose the fine because, being over ninety, he did not relish spending his last few years behind bars, especially as he had already spent eleven years of his life in prison. Hugo Haig-Thomas
Col (retd) Gerhart Schirmer, Sachsenhausen – Workuta. Zehn Jahre in den Fängen der Sowjets (published by the right-wing and independent firm, Grabert Verlag, Tübingen, 1992).
Following a decision by the County Court in Tübingen of 21.8.2002-12.9.2002, this booklet was withdrawn and prohibited on the grounds of racial incitement (file reference 4 Gs 937/02).
Extracts from pages 10, 13 and 37.
There exists a notarized, sworn affidavit about the construction of a gas chamber and a shooting facility [at Sachsenhausen concentration camp] in October/November 1945 by eight prisoners, of whom I was one. Briefly described, this ‘gas chamber’ was a shower room with 25 showerheads in the ceiling. This was supposed to give the impression that the gassing was conducted in it. Adjoining this, we erected a separate chamber with an opening, in front of which the offender would sit facing the opposite side in order to receive a shot in the back of his neck. At least this was what the guide had to explain [to Soviet visitors]. This [guide] was our Fritz Dörbeck who, as a translator, had to act out this piece of theatre because – born in Russia – he spoke perfect Russian. […]
Concerning the falsifications in Sachsenhausen (autumn 1945):
At the beginning of October 1945 Schirmer arrived at the former concentration camp, Sachsenhausen, which the Red Army had occupied since the end of April and which had been taken over by the NKVD [the much feared Jewish secret police that was responsible for political repression during the Stalinist era] who continued to run it as Special Camp No. 7. He describes some of his experiences from this time in his booklet ‘Sachsenhausen-Vorkuta’. Of special interest is his statement concerning the alterations made to the former camp crematorium by German internees, including Schirmer, on the orders from the NKVD. Schirmer later made a statement under oath about it in which he said:
… in early October 1945 I was placed in Oranienburg [ie Sachsenhausen] concentration camp (barrack room 19) which continued to be used by the Soviets. After about fourteen days I was brought into the ‘Steinbau’ (stone buildings) and there, together with seven other prisoners, presented to the political officer of the camp, Lieutenant-Colonel Kolowantienkow. From him we received an order to carry out certain construction work in the so-called Front Zone (Vorzone) of the camp.
Among the seven other prisoners was Dipl.-Ing. Fritz Dörbeck. He was the son of a German geologist who in about 1905 had been tasked by the Tsarist administration to carry out some geological research in the region of Vladivostok. Dörbeck grew up there and spoke fluent Russian. In 1918 the Dörbeck family returned to Germany via China. After his release in 1956, Fritz Dörbeck became the sales director of AEG-Telefunken in Ulm and I remained a close friend of his till his death in 1982.
The seven prisoners also included one Emil Klein, a Sudeten German who also spoke fluent Czech and some Russian. He supervised our construction work and then disappeared from the camp after its completion. We suspected at the time that this Klein was the intermediary [Vertrauensmann] for the Soviets. The seven also included four construction workers and a plumber. I no longer remember their names.
In the middle of October 1945 we were taken to the construction site. There, in the so-called Front Zone of the Camp, was a large shower room with an ante-room. The shower room was about 8×10 square metres and contained about twenty-five shower heads. In the ante-room were about fifty coat hooks.
When we arrived, the material required for the construction work was already there. Under the directions of Klein, we now connected pipes from outside the building to the water supply pipes [Wassernetz]. Outside, on the outside of the wall, taps were attached. Only now was Dipl.-Ing. Dörbeck the first to understand what this work was apparently about. We built an additional concrete cell adjoining the bathroom measuring about 4×2 square metres with an opening into the ante-room of the shower room. The new opening from the ante-room to the newly built so-called ‘execution room’ [Erschießungsraum] was about 20 cms wide. It was made to look as if the offender who was to be shot would have stood at the entrance facing the concrete wall enabling the person with the gun to fire a shot into the back of his head.
The construction works went on for about 14 days. When Dipl.-Ing. Dörbeck and I realised what was being built, we went to the political officer and told him that we refused to undertake any further work. The political officer, Lieutenant-Colonel Kolowantienkow, spoke – often heatedly – with Dörbeck for about fifteen minutes in Russian. Dörbeck later told me that the political officer had said that we would be summarily shot if we ceased to do any further work or let slip one word about it. The political officer said furthermore that we were receiving good rations (which was true) and that he – Dörbeck – would later be required to explain the installation to groups of Soviet visitors. The political officer also said that we would be well-treated in the future and receive good rations. As we were unable to prevent the construction of the installation, it seemed to make sense to us that we should continue the work and, in this way, learn what was being made there.
After completion, at about the end of October 1945, Dipl.-Ing. Dörbeck was brought before the political officer alone and received precise instructions about the explanations he was to give to Soviet groups of visitors. He had to say the following: This installation, which was built by the Nazis, served to kill [Vernichtung] Jews and Soviet officer prisoners. Each day some 200 people were gassed and about twenty-five were shot. This went on from 1943 till 1945 (April). From about December 1945 until the end of 1947 an average of two tours a week, each consisting of some thirty to forty Soviet men, mostly soldiers and people from the GPU, and women, were escorted by Dörbeck round the installation. There were often officers amongst them who quite openly expressed doubts about the age of the installation because they saw that the concrete was new, that there were no bullet holes from the executions in the concrete wall and that the blood stains (red paint) were very meagre and unconvincing. Dörbeck reported to me after each tour. … After Oranienburg concentration camp was closed down in January 1950, Dörbeck and I were sent first to Lichtenberg (Berlin) Prison and then in September 1950 to Vorkuta in the northern Urals.
Signed Gerhart Schirmer
Schirmer placed this declaration, in the same wording, with a notary in 1988. Concerning the detention in Sachsenhausen and Vorkuta. In the Soviet Special Camp No 7 (Sachsenhausen) Schirmer was first barrack room leader and then worked as an ‘appointment assistant’ for the Jewish prisoners’ doctor, Dr Hirschfeld, whose surgery was situated in the pathology building. Schirmer ‘enjoyed’ the privilege of being permitted to sleep in Hirschfield’s surgery. In this way it was possible for him to go into the mortuary at night and count the bodies of people who had died during the day. In this way secret body counts were carried out over the years, alternating or working with fellow prisoners. When Schirmer was sentenced to a whole year’s solitary confinement in 1948, the secret counts were carried out in his absence by Artur Andres. In this way, the number of victims of the NKVD camp Sachsenhausen is known quite precisely. Schirmer reckons they amounted to about 24,600 (‘give or take a hundred’).
When the NKVD camp was closed in January 1950, Schirmer, like many others, was still not free but was sent via Berlin-Lichtenberg and Brest-Litovsk to Vorkuta. Only when the last ‘war criminals’ were released early in 1956 after Adenauer’s negotiations in Moscow in 1955 was Schirmer able to return home. The fact that he survived four years of starvation in Sachsenhausen and the 6 years in Vorkuta borders on a miracle. Schirmer then entered the Bundeswehr [Federal German Army] and retired as a Lieutenant-Colonel. Gerhart Schirmer was rehabilitated by the Russian state. Without him the conversion work on the crematorium in the former concentration camp of Sachsenhausen might never have been known.
“CONFESSIONS” UNDER TORTURE
The Allies used extremely brutal torture against their German prisoners, not just during the war, but afterward, to force them to provide fraudulent confessions to crimes they never committed—all to get convictions at war crime trials. The subject is well known to Revisionists, but the facts have been suppressed by the mainstream for more than 65 years and few people outside of this circle are aware of it.
The American Senator, Joseph McCarthy, in a statement given to the American Press on May 20th, 1949, drew attention to the following cases of torture to secure such confessions. In the prison of the Swabisch Hall, he stated, officers of the S.S. Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler were flogged until they were soaked in blood, after which their sexual organs were trampled on as they lay prostrate on the ground. As in the notorious Malmedy Trials of private soldiers, the prisoners were hoisted in the air and beaten until they signed the confessions demanded of them. On the basis of such “confessions” extorted from S.S. Generals Sepp Dietrich and Joachim Paiper, the Leibstandarte was convicted as a “guilty organisation”. S.S. General Oswald Pohl, the economic administrator of the concentration camp system, had his face smeared with faeces and was subsequently beaten until he supplied his confession.
In dealing with these cases, Senator McCarthy told the Press: “I have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically tortured by methods which could only be conceived in sick brains. They were subjected to mock trials and pretended executions, they were told their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval of the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the required confessions. If the United States lets such acts committed by a few people go unpunished, then the whole world can rightly criticise us severely and forever doubt the correctness of our motives and our moral integrity.” The methods of intimidation described were repeated during trials at Frankfurt-am-Mein and at Dachau, and large numbers of Germans were convicted for atrocities on the basis of their admissions.
The American Judge Edward L. van Roden, one of the three members of the Simpson Army Commission which was subsequently appointed to investigate the methods of justice at the Dachau trials, revealed the methods by which these admissions were secured in the Washington Daily News, January 9th, 1949. His account also appeared in the British newspaper, the Sunday Pictorial, January 23rd, 1949. The methods he described were: “Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolution; torture with burning matches driven under the prisoners finger-nails; knocking out of teeth and breaking jaws; solitary confinement and near starvation rations.” Van Roden explained: “The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months … The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses … All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators.”
The American investigators responsible (and who later functioned as the prosecution in the trials) were: Lt.-Col. Burton F. Ellis (chief of the War Crimes Committee) and his assistants, Capt. Raphael Shumacker, Lt. Robert E. Byrne, Lt. William R. Perl, Mr. Morris Ellowitz, Mr. Harry Thon, and Mr. Kirschbaum. The legal adviser of the court was Col. A. H. Rosenfeld. The reader will immediately appreciate from their names that the majority of these people were “biased on racial grounds” in the words of Justice Wenersturm – that is, were Jewish, and therefore should never have been involved in any such investigation. Despite the fact that “confessions” pertaining to the extermination of the Jews were extracted under these conditions, Nuremberg statements are still regarded as conclusive evidence for the Six Million by writers like Reitlinger and others, and the illusion is maintained that the Trials were both impartial and impeccably fair. When General Taylor, the Chief Public Prosecutor, was asked where he had obtained the figure of the Six Million, he replied that it was based on the confession of S.S. General Otto Ohlendorf. He, too, was tortured and his case is examined below. But as far as such “confessions” in general are concerned, we can do no better than quote the British Sunday Pictorial when reviewing the report of Judge van Roden: “Strong men were reduced to broken wrecks ready to mumble any admission demanded by their prosecutors.”
Reports of widespread torture at the postwar American-run “war crimes” trials at Dachau leaked out, resulting in so many protests that a formal investigation was eventually carried out. A US Army Commission of inquiry consisting of Pennsylvania Judge Edward van Roden and Texas Supreme Court Judge Gordon Simpson officially confirmed the charges of gross abuse. German defendants, they found, were routinely tortured at Dachau with savage beatings, burning matches under fingernails, kicking of testicles, months of solitary confinement, and threats of family reprisals. Low ranking prisoners were assured that their “confessions” would be used only against their former superiors in the dock. Later, though, these hapless men found their own “confessions” used against them when they were tried in turn. High ranking defendants were cynically assured that by “voluntarily” accepting all responsibility themselves they would thereby protect their former subordinates from prosecution.
One Dachau trial court reporter was so outraged at what was happening there in the name of justice that he quit his job. He testified to a US Senate subcommittee that the “most brutal” interrogators had been three German-born Jews. Although operating procedures at the Dachau trials were significantly worse than those used at Nuremberg, they give some idea of the spirit of the “justice” imposed on the vanquished Germans. Virtually all of the US investigators who brought cases before American military courts at Dachau were “Jewish refugees from Germany” who “hated the Germans,” recalled Joseph Halow, a US Army court reporter at the Dachau trials in 1947. “Many of the investigators gave vent to their hated by attempting to force confessions from the Germans by treating them brutally,” including “severe beatings.” The case of Gustav Petrat, a German who had served as a guard at the Mauthausen, was not unusual. After repeated brutal beatings by US authorities, he broke down and signed a perjured statement. He was also whipped and threatened with immediate shooting. Petrat was prevented from securing exonerating evidence, and even potential defense witnesses were beaten and threatened to keep them from testifying. After a farcical trial by a US military court at Dachau, Petrat was sentenced to death and hanged in late 1948. He was 24 years old.
James J. Weingartner, the author of A Peculiar Crusade: Willis M. Everett and the Malmedy Massacre, wrote the story of the Dachau proceedings from information provided by Everett’s family and gleaned from his letters and diary. According to Weingartner, shortly before the proceedings were to begin, defense attorney Lt. Col. Everett interviewed a few of the 73 accused with the help of an interpreter. Although the accused were being held in solitary confinement and had not had the opportunity to consult with each other, most of them told identical stories of misconduct by their Jewish interrogators.
Benjamin Ferencz, Jewish lead U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals in 1945 and 1947: “We did not have a regular courtroom where to call witnesses and question them, with a secretary present and someone who did the cross-examination or that would guarantee their rights. We collected statements from witnesses that we considered favorable and they would write an affidavit. And then they had to swear it in front of an officer. If it was from a hostile witness we would interrogate him privately to see if we could determine the truth. And when we reached the point where we felt we had ascertained the truth, we asked him to write in his own hand and sign it; then usually brought in an officer to witness that.” – USHMM interview 1994
Washington Post: Giving Hitler Hell (21 July 2005): Jewish Intelligence Officer Arnold Weiss: “How did you do it?” I ask Weiss. “The kapos,” he explains, “that’s where we got the idea. We had seen what the DPs (displaced persons) did to the kapos, and we realized they could do us a favor. We studied up a little on military law, and there was nothing on the books preventing us from delivering suspects for additional debriefing to the DPs,” Weiss recalls. He says he’s not sure where the idea originated, who first put it into motion, or how widespread it was. “Whoever first came up with this, I honestly don’t know. I don’t think they’d own up to it anyway.” While it was perfectly legal under military law to hand over suspects for further questioning to DPs, says Benjamin Ferencz, who was a lead U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals in 1945 and 1947, knowingly delivering suspects for execution was not. And of course the DPs were not interested in extracting information.
Benjamin Ferencz: “I once saw DPs (displaced persons) beat an SS man and then strap him to the steel gurney of a crematorium. They slid him in the oven, turned on the heat and took him back out. Beat him again, and put him back in until he was burnt alive. I did nothing to stop it. I suppose I could have brandished my weapon or shot in the air, but I was not inclined to do so. Does that make me an accomplice to murder?”
Lt. William Perl was an Austrian Jew who had emigrated to America in 1940. He was the chief interrogator of Germans accused of the Malmedy massacre. This was because he could speak fluent German; and indeed many of the interrogators at Nuremberg were German or Austrian Jews who had emigrated to America before WWII and were known as the ‘Ritchie Boys’. There were roughly 9000 of these Jews in America and they specialized in the “interrogation” of German prisoners. Perl was an active Zionist who had worked to get European Jews into Palestine illegally before he came to America. Perl was also a good friend and associate of the Zionist Ze’ev Jabotinsky, founder of the murderous Irgun terrorist organization in Israel. Perl supervised the torture of the German defendants. Other Jews on the interrogation staff specalizing in torture techniques at Nuremberg included Josef Kirschbaum, Harry Thon and Morris Ellowitz.
British Postwar Torture Centers
Col. Robin Stephens (pictured left) was in charge of a sadistic torture program during and after WWII, still largely covered up by the British government. Much of the fabricated “evidence” obtained under duress was used as a pretext to convict National Socialist leaders for war crimes. The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
Cruel Britannia: A Secret History of Torture by Ian Cobain
The secrets of the London Cage
How Britain tortured Nazi PoWs
Bad Nenndorf interrogation centre
The interrogation camp that turned prisoners into living skeletons
The postwar photographs that British authorities tried to keep hidden
Tortured Confessions: How the Allies extracted confessions out of captured German soldiers after WWII
Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg
How the Allied Victors of WWII tortured and killed their German prisoners
How Jews tortured innocent Germans to make Holocaust Evidence
The Holocaust legend is built on “confessions” obtained VIA TORTURE; Jewish interrogators beat, tortured, and crushed the testicles of German defendants at war crimes trials.
Untrue Confessions: Fabricated Testimony & Circumstantially Prudent Concessions
Hellstorm — The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 By Thomas Goodrich
NO POISON GAS WAS EVER USED – WITNESSES HAVE LIED!
Allied Committee of Inquiry, “It could be proven that torture was used to extract confessions, and witnesses have lied”
ALLIED MILITARY POLICE HEADQUARTERS…VIENNA… JAN 10th , 1948.
Memo Nr: 31/48
“The Allied Committee of Inquiry has to date proven that no poison gas was ever used to kill prisoners in the following concentration camps……
Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald, Dachau, Flossenburg, Gross-Rosen, Mauthausen, and satellite camps..Natzweller, Neuengamme, Niederhagen(Wewelsberg), Ravensbruck, Sachsenhausen, Stutthoff, Theresienstadt, In all cases where gassings were alleged, it COULD BE PROVEN THAT TORTURE WAS USED TO EXTRACT CONFESSIONS, AND WITNESSES HAVE LIED. Any former inmate who, during their debriefing continues to allege that Poison gas was used to murder people – in particular Jews – are to be reported to this office, and if they insist on lying further, they are to be charged with perjury.”
Signed Major Miller
Commanding Officer..Allied Military Police Vienna
Witnessed by: Lieutenant Lachout MP
[Note: Auschwitz was not included in this camp list, as it was under the jurisdiction of the Jewish Bolshevik Soviets
THOUSANDS OF AUTOPCIES PROVE NO ONE GASSED
Allied Forensic Autopsies Confirm Disease, Not Gas. Medical Doctors who entered camps affirm; No-one was deliberately murdered by Germans – Death was from disease and starvation only
When American and British forces overran western and central Germany in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.
Larson. Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America’s leading forensic pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team, Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim work at Dachau, he was questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors. Dr. Larson’s findings? In a 1980 newspaper interview he said: “What we’ve heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that is a hoax.” And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his biographer that to his knowledge he “was the only forensic pathologist on duty in the entire European Theatre” of Allied military operations, confirmed that “never was a case of poison gas uncovered.” Typhus, Not Poison Gas: If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau, Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as well.
As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was DISEASE, above all TYPHUS, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in Germany at wars end, where, despite such measures as systematic delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the virtual collapse of Germany’s food, transport, and public health systems led to catastrophe, due to Allied military assault.
Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that “The outbreaks in concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus infection encountered in Germany.” Dr. Gordon summarized the causes for the outbreaks as follows: “Germany in the spring months of April and May  was an astounding sight, a mixture of humanity traveling this way and that, homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them…” Dr. Gordon’s findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that “Thousands of prisoners who died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II weren’t deliberately starved to death, but died from a rash of diseases.”
Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed each day. Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to the contrary, no researcher has ever been able to document a German policy of extermination through starvation or any other means in the German camps.
LAMPSHADES MADE FROM GOATS … NOT JEWS!!!
Gen. Lucius D. Clay , United States Military Commander in post-war Germany, in 1976 was supposed to be a speaker at a conference at the George C. Marshall Research Foundation in Virginia. In poor health, he sent last-minute regrets. A month later, he and General Mark W. Clark gave videotaped interviews to a member of the Foundation:
We tried Ilse Koch….She was sentenced to life imprisonment, and I commuted it to three years. And our press really didn’t like that. She had been destroyed by the fact that an enterprising reporter who first went into her house had given her the beautiful name, the “Bitch of Buchenwald,” and he had found some white lampshades in there which he wrote up as being made out of human flesh.
Well, it turned out actually that it was goat flesh. But at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for her to have gotten a fair trial. Similar words were said to Jean Edward Smith in the interview he took: That was one of the reasons I revoked the death sentence of Ilse Koch. There was absolutely no evidence in the trial transcript, other than she was a rather loathsome creature, that would support the death sentence. I suppose I received more abuse for that than for anything else I did in Germany. Some reporter had callled her the “Bitch of Buchenwald,” had written that she had lampshades made out of human skin in her house. And that was introduced in court, where it was absolutely proven that the lampshades were made out of goatskin.
~Lucius D. Clay, An American Life, p. 301. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1990.
I DENY NO HOLOCAUST
Many ignorant, brainwashed people have contemptuously called me a “Holocaust Denier”. The following is the response I give, to those who will listen:
Excuse me, but I don’t “deny” ANY “Holocaust”… Do you?
I fully accept the account of the brave and famous Russian writer and historian, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who was often called “The Conscience of the 20th Century”; who served eight long years in the Soviet Gulag prison system, when he reports in the book he published in the year 2000 entitled “Together For Two Hundred Years” that, in the Soviet Holocaust, 66 million innocent Gentiles, mostly Christians (and it being a full ELEVEN TIMES the number of Jews claimed to have been killed by the Germans in WWII), were kidnapped, tortured, raped, and murdered in a wide variety of cruel, wanton, and horribly inhuman ways in the thousands of monstrously evil Gulag concentration camps at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevik “Ivan the Terrible” Cheka corps. I freely acknowledge the fact that on February 13 & 14, 1945, in the quintessential Holocaust of the non-military city of Dresden, more than 700,000 phosphorus bombs were dropped on 1.2 million helpless people, which produced a firestorm that was called a “Single Column of Flame”, where the temperature in the center of the city reached 1600 degrees centigrade, and in which approximately 500,000 German women, children, elderly, wounded soldiers, random citizens, and even all of the animals in the city zoo were slaughtered by concussion and fire in a single night.
I absolutely recognize that more people died there in Dresden, in that one big flame, than the estimated total of 246,000 helpless people who died in two other quintessential Holocausts, the senseless, wantonly murderous, abominable, and unnecessary atomic attacks upon the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. I openly avow the virtually forgotten Holocaust endured by the passengers and crew of the Wilhelm Gustloff, an unarmed German passenger liner which was torpedoed and sunk in the freezing waters of the Baltic Sea, 13 miles off the coast of Pomerania on January 30, 1945, as it carried, besides it’s men and crew, some 73 wounded soldiers, 373 members of the Womens’ Naval Auxilliary, and some 9,000 German civilian refugees – mostly women and children – who were all fleeing in terror from East Prussia in the advance of the Red Army, and where only a few hundred lived to tell the tale, making it the deadliest disaster in maritime history, killing nearly ten times the number who died on the Titanic. And I fully admit that, as tallied and reported by the International Red Cross, a grand total of 271,304 people – not all of them Jews – died in all of the German concentration camps, combined, by the end of World War II – a Holocaust which was solely the result of typhus epidemics and starvation caused by the Zionist controlled, allied carpet bombings of supply routes and centers all over Germany that made it impossible to transport food and medical supplies to prisoners, soldiers, and civilians alike.
I certainly do not deny the Holocaust of the over 1,000,000 German post-war, non-combatants who were rounded up, detained without any food, water, shelter, or medical care, and purposely, and systematically killed through starvation and exposure in 1945-46 under the supervision of the allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, in the largest outdoor concentration camp this side of modern-day Palestine, or the concurrent Holocaust of the wholesale cold-blooded rape and murder of untold hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of women and children as the communist Red Army of the Soviets also took its “revenge” upon the defeated Germans.
I do not deny the Holocaust suffered by the good men and crew of the practically unarmed USS Liberty surveillance ship, which was deliberately attacked by air and sea, with machine gun, cannon, and torpedo fire by Israeli forces on June 8, 1967, killing 34 and wounding 174, in an attempted false flag operation which was intended to sink the ship, and murder all aboard, in order to draw the United States into the Middle East conflict on the side of Israel, and was only foiled by the ingenuity and resourcefulness of the crew in aiding the radio operator to successfully get off a call for help.
And I do not deny the Holocaust of the some 3,000 people who died in a single day as a result of the false flag attack on the World Trade Center in New York which was engineered and perpetrated by leaders of Israel in order to kick off their pre-planned “Clash of Civilizations” which they hope will eventually cause their two sworn enemies, the Christians, and the Muslims, to forget their historical religious commonalities, and annihilate one another in the yet to be the greatest Holocaust in history – a third world war – as the “Chosen Ones” sit on the sidelines… and direct… and watch… and profit… while gleefully rubbing their hands as even more untold millions of innocents die.
I also do not deny the Holocaust of the Jenin Refugee Camp, on April 13, 2002, where Israeli forces attacked the camp using bulldozers, tanks, and Apache helicopters, in a cruel, indiscriminate, blood-lust slaughter, which was said to be “Horrific beyond belief”, and which lasted for 13 days, flattening large areas of the town, and killing unknown hundreds of innocent men, women, and children, many of whom were buried alive; or the earlier, similar, Holocausts at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982, in which it is known that at least 800 Palestinians were killed.
Nor do I deny the wholesale slaughter and destruction perpetrated upon the sovereign nation of Iraq, in the Holocaust that was the illegal, and unjustified war of aggression that, from 2003 to the present, has resulted in the murder of over 1,000,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children, and brought their country to ruin, as one of the first steps in Israel’s ongoing war of terror, which they have the unmitigated gall to present to the world as a war “ON” terror… for which the final tally of victims is yet to be seen.
And while I’m at it, let me just note here that I fully acknowledge the fact that the perpetrators of the above mentioned, and relatively recent Holocausts have a very long history of either directly, or indirectly committing numerous other such atrocities against many peoples over many millenia, even since ancient Biblical times – from the slaughter of the Midianites to the African slave trade – a number of which being the basis of, and celebrated during various Jewish holidays. And though I do not particularly describe them here, I don’t deny any of them either.
What I do deny is the ridiculous and exaggerated claim that there is ANY evidence at all that ANY Jews at all – much less “six million” of them – died from ANY intentional gassings, or as a result of ANY kind of organized or systematic program of genocide perpetrated against Jews by Germany’s Nazi regime… and I challenge you to produce ANY evidence or “proof” that is not merely made up of either pre-war, wartime, or post-war anti-German propaganda… because none, from either then or now, actually exists.
So, if you want to talk about a “Holocaust”… and I mean a REAL, genuine, genocidal “Holocaust”, and not only the ones from the past, but one that is happening right NOW, in the present, all you need to do is to pull your brain-dead/brainwashed heads out of your collectively ignorant rear ends, and look into the current goings-on in Gaza, The West Bank, Syria, and the Middle East in general, where the racist, supremacist, Zionist, Talmudic Jews are feverishly working day and night to exterminate anyone, either Gentile or Jew, who stands in their way in their quest to build their racist, supremacist, “Kingdom of the World”… Israel.
And if any of you sanctimonious accusers deny any of these realities, and merely cling to the all too common view that the only “Holocaust” that really matters is one that is purported to have been suffered by the Jews, then for people like you to call anyone else a “Holocaust Denier” is one of the most laughable, and hypocritical examples of psychopathic projection I have yet seen anywhere… even as you continue to stupidly, and unashamedly, prove your ignorance and psychopathy with every ridiculous charge you make.
LESS THAN 20,000 JEWS DIED IN WWII
International Committee of the Red Cross Records: The International Red Cross was stationed in all German labour, internment, concentration and prison camps throughout World War Two. The Red Cross were never given access to any Russian camps before, during or after World War Two. At his trials in Canada, during the 1980s and 1990s, Professor Ernst Zundel finally got the Red Cross to release their records from the German camps despite strong Israeli objections. The Red Cross records seem to suggest that there were no gas chambers, and a total of 271,301 (fewer than 20,000 of these were Jews) died during World War Two in these camps, mostly from typhus. IIn a letter to the US State Department dated November 22nd 1944 The Red Cross, who were stationed in all the camps, stated : “We have not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners.”
That is how big of a JEWISH LIE we are dealing with. Of the 271,000 persons who died in all the camps throughout the war, FEWER THAN 20,000 of them were Jews !! No wonder Hitler said Jews are Masters of the Big Lie !!
NO EVIDENCE OF GENOCIDE
One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83).
Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.
In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) – Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol. III, p. 594).
NOT ALL WERE INTERNED
Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on.”
In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labor market” (Vol. I, p. 646).
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645).
As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the. Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.
The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p . 649).
Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that “Did Six Million Really Die?” quoted from the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did so accurately. A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross’ International Tracing Service) under oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).