Ernst Zundel Did Six Million Really Die


Giants who ruled America




I’ve always been interested in this topic even before it became a topic.


Even Abraham Lincoln talk about the Giants

Why you shouldn’t believe anything the FBI says about Vegas shooting By Jon Rappoport

Why you shouldn’t believe anything the FBI says about the Vegas shooting
Why you shouldn’t believe anything the FBI says about Vegas shooting
By Jon Rappoport
No matter how the Vegas shooting investigation looks, the FBI is playing a large role. The forensics, in particular, would be checked by FBI techs and labs.
Vital lab analysis of weapons and ammunition and bullet-angles and cartridges and residue. Weapons Paddock had or didn’t have. Ammunition he had or didn’t have. Modifications he made or didn’t make to those weapons. How many different kinds of bullets were found in victims? What weapons did those bullets come from?
And depending on that evidence—were there multiple shooters, for example?
Should you believe the FBI’s analyses?
Are you kidding? The scurrilous reputation of the FBI in its handling of forensics is astonishing. Read on. Note: I’m saving the best for last:
In 2014-15, stories appeared in the press about the phenomenal corruption of the FBI evidence lab. But since then, there has been very little follow-up. I find no compelling evidence that the federal government has fixed the problem.
April 20, 2015, The Atlantic: “…the Washington Post made clear Saturday in an article that begins with a punch to the gut… ‘Nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000,’ the newspaper reported, adding that ‘the cases include those of 32 defendants sentenced to death’.”
August 12, 2014, New Scientist: “…the initial results were released of an ongoing review of thousands of criminal cases in which FBI scientists’ testimony may have led to wrongful convictions – including for some people now on death row…[an FBI source states] ‘we teach these people [lab techs in training] for two weeks, and they would go back to their laboratories with a certificate of completion and be told: Great you’re qualified to do this [analysis of evidence] – here’s your caseload.'”
Washington Post, April 18, 2015: “The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.”
“Of 28 examiners with the FBI Laboratory’s microscopic hair comparison unit, 26 overstated forensic matches in ways that favored prosecutors in more than 95 percent of the 268 trials reviewed so far, according to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the Innocence Project, which are assisting the government with the country’s largest post-conviction review of questioned forensic evidence.”
“The cases include those of 32 defendants sentenced to death. Of those, 14 have been executed or died in prison, the groups said under an agreement with the government to release results after the review of the first 200 convictions.”
Giant long-term scandal and corruption. The story is covered. Then it disappears.
Now here’s the capper:
On April 19, 1995, one-third of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City blew up, killing 169 people and wounding 680 others.
Three men were arrested and convicted: Tim McVeigh, Terry Nichols, and Michael Fortier. McVeigh was put to death on June 11, 2001, Nichols is currently serving multiple life sentences without the possibility of parole, and Fortier was sentenced to 12 years (he served that term and was released).
The official narrative of the bombing stated: A Ryder truck parked at the curb outside the Murrah Building contained barrels of ammonium nitrate plus fuel oil (ANFO bombs), and their coordinated explosion occurred shortly after 9AM on the morning of April 19th.
In addition to the deaths and the woundings, the explosion impacted 324 buildings and 86 cars in the area.
(In my 1995, book, “The Oklahoma City Bombing, the Suppressed Truth,” I laid to rest the claim that ANFO bombs could have caused that much damage; and more importantly, I showed that an explosion coming out of a Ryder truck at the curb could not have caused the particular profile of damage sustained by the Murrah Building.)
The vaunted FBI lab decided that, indeed, all the damage and death HAD been caused by ANFO bombs in the Ryder truck.
But wait.
Buckle up.
Two years after the bombing, on March 22, 1997, we had this from CNN: “The Justice Department inspector general’s office has determined that the FBI crime laboratory working on the Oklahoma City bombing case made ‘scientifically unsound’ conclusions that were ‘biased in favor of the prosecution,’ The Los Angeles Times reported Saturday.”
“…[FBI] supervisors approved lab reports that they ‘cannot support’ and…FBI lab officials may have erred about the size of the blast, the amount of explosives involved and the type of explosives used in the bombing[!].”
“…harshest criticism was of David Williams, a supervisory agent in the [FBI] explosives unit, the paper [LA Times] said. Those flaws reportedly include the basis of his determination that the main charge of the explosion was ammonium nitrate. The inspector general called such a determination ‘inappropriate,’ the Times said.”
“…FBI officials found a receipt for ammonium nitrate at defendant [Terry] Nichols’ home and, because of that discovery, Williams slanted his conclusion to match the evidence.”
And with those revelations, the case, the investigation, the court trials, and press probes should have taken a whole new direction. But they didn’t.
The fake science was allowed to stand.
So now…there is no reason to believe anything the FBI says about Paddock, his weapons, his ammo, his modifications, the degree of his participation (or non-participation) in the shooting, the trajectories of bullets, the types of bullets found in victims, the nature of the expended shell casings, and other VITAL forensic details in the case.

The German Miracle part 2

The German Miracle p 2 from TELL THE TRUTH & SHAME THE DEVI L p 8 7
Last sentence says it all…..
Germany invented its own way out of the dilemma: economic self-sufficiency. The Reich’s government began to guide the national economy by means of two four-year plans. The first four-year plan, starting in 1933, was intended to improve the nutrition of the population and rapidly
reduce high unemployment. The plan had, in first place, an internal effect. The second four-year plan, from 1936 onward, was intended to minimize the economic dependence of the German Reich on foreign trade. As Germany had been cut off from its raw materials and foodstuffs requirements during the war, Hitler planned to secure the country against a repetition of such a predicament.
The plan from 1936 onward was intended to improve Germany’s self-sufficiency, to increase economic independence from foreign sources and to stimulate its own exports. As a result, the second
four-year plan impinged negatively on the economies of other
countries. The Reich’s government steered a course that rehabilitated the domestic economy largely without foreign products and credits. There were two tracks to this course, one for the domestic market, the other for foreign trade. In the domestic economy, science and industry developed substitutes for materials and products
which formerly came from abroad. The internal circulation of
money for the construction of roads, housing and armament was launched through an artificial currency, so-called MEFO bills (Metallurgische Forschungsgesellschaft), a kind of promissory note.
Banks reduced interest rates drastically. Foreign exchange and gold trade with other countries were controlled by the state and withdrawn from the private sector. Foreign companies could only export
their profits in kind, not in cash. All this stimulated the
population’s subsistence and the creation of new jobs.
The other track concerned German foreign trade. The German Reich concluded bilateral contracts with 25 countries with weak currencies in Southern Europe, the Near East and South America, involving trade free of payment, i.e. without foreign currencies, in other words, goods for goods, for instance, Chilean lentils against German locomotives.
The exchange of goods between Germany and its partners was settled on a monthly basis, without the payment
of foreign currencies and without the need to pre-finance
trade through loans and interest-bearing money. In this way, Germany constructed for itself an informal special economic zone between 1932 and 1936, a German preferentialism. . . .
However—and this is the catch—the U.S.A., Britain and
France lost important sectors of the market, which they had hitherto dominated, particularly the U.S.A. in South America. Moreover, New York and London lost their credit business through the pre-financing of foreign trade in the countries which now engaged in barter with Germany.
It appeared as if Germany was developing from a financial
dwarf into an economic giant, namely at the expense of the victors of the First World War. President Roosevelt was now concerned about Germany’s success in South America, that U.S. credit business
n South America was declining and, lastly, that the German
“model” was becoming attractive in the U.S.A. and could affect
his—Roosevelt’s—popularity. After all, Hjalmar Schacht, president of the Reichsbank and Minister for Trade, and Hitler’s politics had succeeded in dismantling unemployment in Germany and in doubling the people’s income, while Roosevelt with his New Deal, despite thriving foreign trade, was still faced with 10.4 million unemployed.
Britain too was affected by Germany’s independent path. Although the Ottawa-countries cordoned themselves off and thus prevented free trade, Germany’s way of excluding the international capital markets and of exploiting, through preferential rules, the markets of 25 other countries was in their view unacceptable. After the war, English historian General Fuller wrote concerning German- English relations: “Hitler’s dream was thus an alliance with
Great Britain. . . such an alliance was however impossible mainly because, immediately after Hitler’s takeover, his economic policy of direct barter and of export premiums dealt British and American trade a deadly blow.”
U.S. President Roosevelt expressed the same more briefly,
when he said to his son, Elliot, on the day he decided to lead the U.S.A. at Britain’s side into the war: “Would anyone maintain that Germany’s attempt to dominate trade in Central Europe was not one of the main reasons for the war?”

The German Miracle

From the book Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil….

by Gerard Menuhin

Hjalmar Schacht, who was then head of the German central
bank, is quoted in a bit of wit that sums up the German version of
the “Greenback” miracle. An American banker had commented,
“Dr. Schacht, you should come to America. We’ve lots of money,
and that’s real banking.” Schacht replied, “You should come to
Berlin. We don’t have money. That’s real banking.” ( John Weitz,
Hitler’s Banker, Great Britain: Warner Books, 1999)
The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when
its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations
and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Yet
through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and
a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able
to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could
exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years,
even before armament spending began. (Henry C.K. Liu, “Nazism
and the German Economic Miracle,” quoted in Web of Debt, Ellen
Brown, p. 236)
Germany financed its entire government and war operations
from 1935 to 1945 without gold and without debt, and it took the
whole Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German
power over Europe and bring Europe back under the heel of the
bankers. Such history of money does not even appear in the textbooks
of public (government) schools today. (Sheldon Emry, Billions
for the Bankers, Debts for the People, 1984, ibid.)
Germany’s unforgivable crime before the second world war
was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s
trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which
would deny world finance its opportunity to profit. (Churchill to
Lord Robert Boothby, quoted in the Foreword, 2nd Ed. Sydney
Rogerson, Propaganda in the Next War, 2001, orig. 1938)
The protocols have been fulfilled. Zionism rules the world. It
created the second world war because Hitler double crossed the
Jewish and Christian money gang that gave him one hundred million
dollars and it will start a third world war if necessary to completely
enslave the people as stated in the protocols. (Henry Klein,
Zionism Rules the World, 1948)

Crimes against the Germans book

Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation 1944-1950

a book by James Bacque


More than nine million Germans died as a result of deliberate Allied starvation and expulsion policies after the Second World War – one quarter of the country was annexed, and about fifteen million people expelled in the largest act of ethnic cleansing the world has ever known. Western governments continue to conceal and deny these deaths. At the same time, Herbert Hoover and Canadian Prime Minister MacKenzie King created the largest charity in history, a food-aid program that saved an estimated 800 million lives during three years of global struggle against post-Second World War famine – a program the German people were initially excluded from as a matter of official Allied policy. Revised and updated for this new edition, “Crimes and Mercies” was first published by Little, Brown in the UK in 1997, becoming an immediate best seller.

A Review of James Bacque’s “Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation 1944-1950” by Eric Blair    According to Bacque, given the extraordinarly harsh conditions imposed upon them by the Allies (i.e., the British, French, Soviets, and Americans), at least 9.3 million and possibly as many as 13.7 million Germans, had, by 1950, needlessly died as a result.